Exp.

[Jamus]

I don't know if this is like one of Haddion's suggestions or whatever, but: why don't we gain experience hit by hit? Such as, if they are the same rank as you, you gain that much exp. per shot they take - if they are one rank higher, you get that much exp. per hit. So if the battle is ended, and you die, or flee (or something like that), you still get the exp..

[Guest]

Intricate code is way too much trouble, grouping coudl possibyl degrogate, cleric groups would OWN an a warrior/cleric combo would own more. AR is oriented aroudn community. Making xp. based off of a single players hit and level ratio to a MOB would kill that aspect of the game. Atleast, from what your offering it would. Or did I mis-interpert your idea?

[Quiet Wanderer]

The above was me. I reset my p-word then forgot to re-log in. Sorry.

[Jamus]

I have NO IDEA what you were talking about, so... yes. Yes you did.

[Davairus]

sounds like warriors would steal all the exp after mages have gone to the trouble of spelling them up, curing them etc.

[Jamus]

Alright. That makes sense. Probably a bad idea. But,, what if spells counted, too? Then would it be a good idea?

[Quiet Wanderer]

No.... IT would be crazy.... YOu'd hit fifty in no time at all. The idea behind killed based XP, generally, is that you truly become stronger and wiser after you have defeated an opponent. Skill profencies can go up during a fight, which adds to realism of learning mid-fight. Xp. is earned by killing.

[Jamus]

Alright - thanks for your input, everyone.